This is IN THE NEWS in VOA Special English.
This week, President Obama said he now supports same-sex marriage.
BARACK OBAMA: “I think same-sex couples should be able to get married.”
He became the first sitting American president to express that opinion. Earlier he had said his thinking on the issue was “evolving.”
Reaction in Congress was mixed. Nancy Pelosi, the leader of the minority Democrats in the House of Representatives, welcomed the news.
NANCY PELOSI: “America’s children and families and workers saw history being made right before their very eyes: the president of the United States advancing civil rights in our country.”
But Speaker John Boehner and other Republicans in the House said the president was sending the wrong message at the wrong time.
JOHN BOEHNER: “I believe that marriage is the union between one man and one woman. And the president, the Democrats can talk about all this all they want. But, the fact is, the American people are focused on our economy, and they are asking the question: where are the jobs?”
House Republicans are leading a court case against the administration for not defending a federal law called the Defense of Marriage Act. That nineteen ninety-six law defines marriage as between one man and one woman.
In the Senate, Republicans did not say much about the president’s announcement. Instead, they stressed the need for jobs. Democratic Majority Leader Harry Reid said he would support same-sex marriage if the issue were put to voters in his home state of Nevada.
Mr. Obama received strong support from politically influential gays and lesbians in the two thousand eight campaign. His re-election campaign says donations from both groups have greatly increased since his announcement.
Mitt Romney, the likely Republican presidential candidate, opposes same-sex marriage.
MITT ROMNEY: “My view is that marriage is a relationship between a man and a woman, and that is the position I have had for some time and I don’t intend to make any adjustments at this point.”
Support for same-sex marriage has grown in recent years, especially among younger people. A recent Gallup public opinion survey suggested that Americans are now evenly split on the issue. Gallup first asked the question in nineteen ninety-six. That year only twenty-seven percent of people said they supported same-sex marriage.
The president’s position on the issue gained new attention after a TV appearance Sunday by Vice President Joe Biden. He was on NBC’s “Meet the Press” program.
JOE BIDEN: “I am absolutely comfortable with the fact that men marrying men, women marrying women, and heterosexual men and women marrying one another are entitled to the same exact rights, all the civil rights, all the civil liberties.”
President Obama announced the change in his thinking on ABC News on Wednesday.
BARACK OBAMA: “At a certain point, I just concluded that for me personally, it is important for me to go ahead and affirm that I think same-sex couples should be able to get married.”
He noted his success at ending the military’s “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” policy and his opposition to the Defense of Marriage Act.
But Mr. Obama said he still supports the right of individual states to decide the marriage issue. He spoke a day after a large majority of voters in North Carolina approved a state constitutional ban on homosexual marriage. North Carolina became the thirtieth state to pass such an amendment. The ban also includes civil unions and domestic partnerships.
Currently, six of the fifty states and the District of Columbia allow same-sex couples to marry. Nine states allow civil unions or provide rights under domestic partnership laws.
And that’s IN THE NEWS in VOA Special English.
Contributing: Michael Bowman, Marissa Melton, Dan Robinson and Cindy Saine
This is the VOA Special English Technology Report.
Last week we reported on Microsoft Corporation’s Imagine Cup finals in the United States. Team FlashFood from Arizona State University won top honors at the event. Its mobile application and website lets hotels, restaurants and farmers markets donate food to people who need it.
The FlashFood project grew out of the Engineering Projects in Community Service program at Arizona State. The director of the program, Richard Filley, says the project has far-reaching possibilities. Mr. Filley plans to work with the team to decide what changes are necessary to make the project successful in other countries. For example, he notes a method of saving uneaten food, commonly called a doggie bag.
RICHARD FILLEY: “After you’ve gone to a restaurant, if you don’t eat all the food you take what’s left over and put it in what’s called a doggie bag. You take it home. You may feed it to the dog or you may eat it. Would those cultures in those different countries be open to the idea of taking leftover food and using FlashFood to connect with people who are hungry? We don’t know the answer to that yet.”
The Microsoft Imagine Cup competition is now in its tenth year. Mark Hindsbo is a vice president with Microsoft. He says students today have a lot of technology available to help with their projects.
MARK HINDSBO: “In the beginning people were building almost everything from scratch. We have built a lot of things in the industry over those ten years.”
Mr. Hindsbo says many of the software applications needed to complete such projects already exist. He offers Team FlashFood as a good example.
MARK HINDSBO: “The fact that they can build on the assumption that there are smartphones in the hands of most of the people that they need to coordinate with, there’s an online service with mapping and turn by turn direction.”
The Microsoft official says solving world problems is a major goal of the Imagine Cup competition. But, he adds, there is another goal that is equally important.
MARK HINDSBO: “In the U.S. alone we have probably around a million jobs that risk being unfilled over the next five years within the software and tech sector because we don’t have enough students. So when you look at the pipeline in science, technology engineering and math we come up way short.”
Mark Hindbro says he welcomes any efforts to increase interest in these areas of study.
A team from Drexel University also was a winner at the Imagine Cup finals in the United States. The Drexel Dragons designed a game to help students better understand mathematics. The Dr. Fishbowl team from Carnegie Melon University designed a game that teaches about sustainability, byproducts and waste.
Team FlashFood will represent the United States at the Imagine Cup worldwide finals in Sydney, Australia. The event takes place July sixth through the tenth. And that’s the VOA Special English Technology Report. I’m Faith Lapidus.
Contributing: June Simms
STEVE EMBER: Welcome to THE MAKING OF A NATION – American history in VOA Special English. I’m Steve Ember. This week in our series, we continue the story of the presidency of George W. Bush.
George W. Bush began his second term — and fifth year in office — in January two thousand five.
Early in his first term, terrorists had carried out the worst attacks in United States history. President Bush declared a war on terror and led the country into wars in Afghanistan and Iraq.
In his second inaugural address, he promised to continue fighting to defeat terrorism and increase democracy around the world.
GEORGE W. BUSH: “So it is the policy of the United States to seek and support the growth of democratic movements and institutions in every nation and culture, with the ultimate goal of ending tyranny in our world.”
He also talked about his goals at home and what he called America’s ideal of freedom.
GEORGE W. BUSH: “In America’s ideal of freedom, citizens find the dignity and security of economic independence instead of laboring on the edge of subsistence. This is the broader definition of liberty that motivated the Homestead Act, the Social Security Act, and the GI Bill of Rights…
“We will widen the ownership of homes and businesses, retirement savings, and health insurance, preparing our people for the challenges of life in a free society. By making every citizen an agent of his or her own destiny, we will give our fellow Americans greater freedom from want and fear and make our society more prosperous and just and equal.”
The United States Constitution limits presidents to two terms. Presidential historian Russell Riley at the University of Virginia’s Miller Center says presidents traditionally use their first term to focus on their major goals for the country.
Second terms, he says, “tend to be unhappy times.”
During his second term, Richard Nixon resigned over the attempt to hide political wrongdoing in the Watergate case. Bill Clinton faced a trial in the Senate over his attempt to hide a relationship with a young aide.
But the first major problem of George Bush’s second term dropped from the sky.
SUSAN BENNETT: “You saw people on the rooftops. You saw people using claw hammers trying to break through their attic to get up onto their roof. That’s why you had so many people who drowned.”
In August of two thousand five, Susan Bennett received a phone call from her daughter, a television reporter in New Orleans, Louisiana.
SUSAN BENNETT: “She called, on a Friday, and said, ‘I think you need to come pick up my son, because there’s a really big storm coming.’”
It was Hurricane Katrina — one of the worst natural disasters in American history. Along the Gulf of Mexico the hardest hit states were Louisiana, Mississippi and Alabama. Over one thousand eight hundred people died. Property damage totaled more than seventy-five billion dollars.
But Katrina will be remembered mostly because of what happened in New Orleans.
(STORM SOUND AND VOICE)
A day before the storm hit, officials had ordered everyone to leave the city. But thousands of people stayed. Some chose not to leave. Others were too poor, too old or too sick to go.
Then, the levees broke.
(MUSIC AND FLOOD SOUNDS)
Those flood barriers were supposed to protect the city. Much of New Orleans was built on land that lies below sea level.
As Katrina hit, more than eighty percent of the city flooded. In some areas, the water was six meters deep.
Many people who stayed were caught in the floods.
Officials struggled to get food, water and medicine to the survivors. The displaced included thousands of people who took shelter in the Superdome, a big sports arena.
Out on the streets, lawless acts fed a sense of disorder and helplessness.
WOMAN: “It’s disgusting and frustrating. And we are human beings, and they’re treating us like we’re criminals.”
GROUP OF PEOPLE SHOUTING: “We want help! We want help! Help us!”
Susan Bennett helped create an exhibit about Hurricane Katrina at the Newseum, a museum of news in Washington.
SUSAN BENNETT: “Not only in this country, but also in newspapers across the world, you saw the same headline. It ranged from ‘Engulfed’ to ‘Our Tsunami.’ ‘Chaos.’ And then it went to ‘Anarchy,’ ‘National Disgrace.’”
Congress later found that officials at every level of government — local, state and federal — had failed in doing their jobs.
President Bush flew over New Orleans to inspect the damage. A photograph showed him looking out the window of Air Force One at the ground below. Russell Riley at the University of Virginia says the picture expressed what many people were thinking about the handling of the disaster.
RUSSELL RILEY: “Because of the ineffectiveness of the government response at the time, that image communicated to the American people that the president was remote. That he wasn’t on the ground. That the best he could do was just look out the window of a passing plane.”
In two thousand five a different kind of storm was hitting Iraq. American and Iraqi officials were struggling to create a democratic government. Local militias were on the rise and attacking coalition forces and other Iraqis.
The violence also included al-Qaida suicide bombings in Iraq, which angered many Iraqis. And there was international anger as the result of photos that showed American troops abusing Iraqi prisoners.
President Bush had declared the end of major combat operations on May first, two thousand three. That was less than two months after the invasion. But the numbers of civilian and military deaths were growing. And, in the United States, surveys were showing that a growing number of Americans thought going into Iraq was a mistake.
JUDITH YAPHE: “The bad news was we were uncomfortable with it, and we wanted to get out, and we could not understand how things could go so terribly wrong.”
Judith Yaphe joined the National Defense University after twenty years as a Middle East expert at the Central Intelligence Agency.
JUDITH YAPHE: “That’s where the lack of strategy and the mismanagement come in. But I think it’s also true that, you know, Americans just wanted to say, ‘Why are we in Iraq? Why are we in any of these places?’ Because, historically speaking, it’s not a role we’ve been comfortable with.”
She says by President Bush’s second term, few Iraqis wanted to cooperate with the Americans to make the country more secure. But President Bush said American troops could not leave until Iraqi forces replaced them.
In two thousand six, an Iraqi court sentenced the country’s former leader to death. Saddam Hussein was hanged for crimes against humanity. But nothing else seemed to change — violence and insurgent attacks continued.
Iraq seemed to be on the edge of being torn apart by civil war.
Early the next year, President Bush announced that he was sending more troops to Iraq. He thought it would help stop the violence.
GEORGE W. BUSH: “These troops will work alongside Iraqi units and be embedded in their formations. Our troops will have a well-defined mission – to help Iraqis clear and secure neighborhoods, to help them protect the local population, and to help ensure that the Iraqi forces left behind are capable of providing the security that Baghdad needs.”
The temporary increase of about thirty thousand troops came to be called “the surge.”
In September of two thousand seven, the top commander in Iraq reported to Congress that the violence was decreasing. The surge may have helped create the conditions for this change but there were other reasons as well. Middle East expert Judith Yaphe says many Iraqis decided to work with the Americans to defeat the insurgency.
JUDITH YAPHE: “The real truth is – and it’s a good news story – that the Iraqis themselves saw that this was a greater danger to them, that there was nothing to be gained, the Sunnis of Iraq in particular, saw that al-Qaida was hurting them, that it was a danger to them, that there was much more to be gained by aligning with the US forces.”
By the time President Bush was finishing his second term, Iraqi and American officials had agreed on a withdrawal date to end the war. The last American forces would leave Iraq by the end of twenty-eleven.
Russell Riley at the University of Virginia says it is too soon to know how history will judge the United States’ actions in Iraq.
RUSSELL RILEY: “If Iraq proves to be a policy success, then the surge will be a critical turning point and a terrific exercise of presidential leadership.”
He also points out that the war is not the only measure by which the forty-third president will be judged.
Professor Riley put it this way: “The great debate among historians will not be whether Bush was a powerful president or consequential president, but whether he directed those powers in the most fruitful way that he could have.”
So, what else was going on in the United States during this period? Millions of people were voting for which singer should get a recording contract on “American Idol.” Year after year it was the most popular show on television.
SIMON COWELL: “Oh, Robert, I think you just killed my favorite song of all time.”
ROBERT: “Killed in a good way or a bad way?”
SIMON: “Killing is never good. There’s never a happy killing.”
ROBERT: “I’m sorry to hear that.”
SIMON: “No, that was first degree on that one.”
But the biggest story in music was not what people were listening to, but how. Sales of CDs in stores fell as more and more people downloaded songs from the Internet. On iTunes, Fergie’s “Big Girls Don’t Cry” was the most downloaded song of two thousand seven.
For the first half of the decade, there seemed to be nothing to cry about in the American housing market.
Home prices were going up and up, which made sellers happy. And lenders were offering bigger and bigger loans at easy terms and low interest rates, which made buyers happy.
The government supported the easing of lending rules as a form of social policy, a way to help more people buy homes. Rates of home ownership — a part of the American Dream — reached record highs. In two thousand five nearly seven out of ten Americans owned their own home.
But many home buyers had been given mortgage loans that they could not afford to pay back. And that was not the only problem. Banks had been selling those loans as securities to investors around the world. Everyone thought they were getting a good deal — the banks, the borrowers, the investors.
But then the price bubble burst and the housing market collapsed.
Many borrowers lost their homes because they were unable to make their monthly loan payments. That was the situation Karen Lucas and her husband, of Cleveland, Ohio, found themselves in.
KAREN LUCAS: “I’ve done my crying. I’ve made my peace, and I put it in God’s hands.”
As home values fell, many people found themselves “underwater,” meaning they owed more on their mortgage than their house was worth.
Suddenly there was a lot to cry about. By the end of two thousand seven, the economy was sliding into the Great Recession. That — and the election of two thousand eight — will be our story next week.
You can find our series online with transcripts, MP3s, podcasts and pictures at voaspecialenglish.com. You can also follow us on Facebook and Twitter at VOA Learning English. I’m Steve Ember, inviting you to join us again next week for THE MAKING OF A NATION — American history in VOA Special English.
This was program #239. For earlier programs, type “Making of a Nation” in quotation marks in the search box at the top of the page.